Types of Attacks on Verification Methods
Biometric System Attacks
Biometric systems, including those used for facial scans, are susceptible to various attack surfaces. There are nine primary attack surfaces in biometric systems, each presenting unique vulnerabilities:
Sensor Attacks: These involve tampering with the sensor used to capture biometric data. Attackers might use spoofing techniques, such as presenting a photo, video, or 3D mask to the sensor.
Transmission Attacks: Intercepting or altering the data during transmission from the sensor to the processing unit.
Processing Attacks: Manipulating the algorithms or software that process biometric data to produce false verification results.
Database Attacks: Unauthorized access or tampering with the biometric database where the biometric templates are stored.
Replay Attacks: Capturing and reusing previously transmitted biometric data to gain unauthorized access.
Template Attacks: Attacking the biometric templates directly to create a duplicate or alter the data.
Attack on the Matching Algorithm: Manipulating the algorithm responsible for matching the biometric input with the stored template.
Attack on the Output Device: Altering the device that outputs the result of the biometric verification process.
Attack on the Administration System: Targeting the system administrators or the infrastructure managing the biometric system.
An example of the high stakes involved in securing biometric systems is the bounty program by Facetec, used by Tinder, which offers $600K to anyone who can spoof their facial recognition system. This underscores the importance of robust security measures in biometric verification.
Technical Risks
In addition to biometric system-specific attacks, there are broader technical risks associated with biometric verification, particularly in decentralized and blockchain-based systems:
Smart Contract Risks: Vulnerabilities in smart contracts can lead to exploits where attackers might manipulate the verification process or the associated data.
Private Key Leakage: The compromise of private keys can lead to unauthorized access and manipulation of the system.
To mitigate these risks, we leverage a robust network of security partners, including the founders of Certik and Consensys, who specialize in blockchain security and auditing.
Encryption and Secure Channels
To further enhance security and mitigate potential attacks, we implement several advanced techniques:
Encryption: All biometric data, whether in transit or at rest, is encrypted using state-of-the-art cryptographic techniques to ensure data integrity and confidentiality.
Private Channeling: Secure communication channels are established to prevent interception and tampering of biometric data during transmission.
Unique Watermarking: Each biometric input is embedded with a unique watermark to detect and prevent duplication or unauthorized use.
Multimodal Systems: By integrating multiple biometric modalities (e.g., facial recognition, fingerprint, voice), we create a more robust and secure verification system that is harder to spoof.
Sybil Attacks
Sybil attacks, where an attacker creates multiple fake identities to manipulate the system, pose a significant threat to biometric verification systems. Our approach to mitigating Sybil attacks includes:
Routing and Misbehavior Detection: We implement machine learning techniques to monitor and detect anomalous behavior in the network, identifying potential Sybil attacks.
Graph-Based Detection Methods: Utilizing graph theory, we analyze the relationships and interactions between entities within the network to detect and mitigate the presence of multiple fraudulent identities.
By addressing these key areas, we enhance the security and reliability of our biometric verification systems, ensuring robust protection against a wide range of potential attacks and vulnerabilities.
Last updated